The EIP conceded to the fact that they are “not a fact-checking organization,” making claims that certain things could not be evaluated objectively and so personal decisions were made. The EIP reports that only 42% of tickets submitted were verified with at least one external fact-checker.
- Should indicate that they are not concerned with the truth
EIP proceeded to assertively flag content on all social media platforms, even those not entirely remotely invalidated → should indicate that a very sensitive political agenda was governing speech around the election, very little care for incorrectly censoring